How to judge democracy by its outcomes: accountable and legitimate government, economic growth, inequality, accommodating diversity, and dignity and freedom.
| Growth 1950–2000, all countries | dictatorships 4.42%, democracies 3.95% |
| Growth, poor countries | dictatorships 4.34%, democracies 4.28% |
| Legitimate government | the people’s own, chosen by them |
| Gap in rates | 4.42 − 3.95 = 0.47 percentage points |
(a) In the book’s table, how much faster did dictatorships grow than democracies overall (4.42% vs 3.95%), and among poor countries (4.34% vs 4.28%)? (b) For an economy of ₹8,100 crore, what is the overall gap worth in a year, to the nearest crore? (c) Why does the book still prefer democracy?
Working: 4.42 − 3.95; 4.34 − 4.28; 0.47% of 8,100
Answer: (a) 0.47 and 0.06 percentage points (b) about ₹38 crore (c) The gap is small, and democracy has other outcomes like dignity, freedom and legitimacy.